Public-Goods Games with Endogenous Institution-Formation: Experimental Evidence on the Effect of the Voting Rule
نویسندگان
چکیده
We report experimental results on voluntary contributions to public-goods provision from situations in which parties can create institutions to impose a certain contribution level on its members. We focus on a public-goods game where the joint decisions inside the institution are made based on the plurality voting rule. We show that, comparing to the unanimity voting rule, the plurality rule results in a significant and large decrease in the institution initiation rate, along with a significant and large increase in the institution implementation rate. In the end, as the two effects cancel each other out, the choice of the voting rule does not significantly affect the average contribution level or efficiency.
منابع مشابه
Comparing the effect of religiosity on public goods production and natural resource conservation: a experimental study
In this research, the effect of religiosity on participation in the production of public goods and preservation of natural resources has been investigated. Extraction of participation data and conservation of natural resource has been done through the implementation of online laboratory of public goods and natural resource games. To extract the three dimensions of religiosity (belief, rituals a...
متن کاملInstitution Formation in Public Goods Games
Institution Formation in Public Goods Games Centralized sanctioning institutions are of utmost importance for overcoming free-riding tendencies and enforcing outcomes that maximize group welfare in social dilemma situations. However, little is known about how such institutions come into existence. In this paper we investigate, both theoretically and experimentally, the endogenous formation of i...
متن کاملPublic goods, participation constraints, and democracy: A possibility theorem
It is well known that ex post e¢ cient mechanisms for the provision of indivisible public goods are not interim individually rational. However, the corresponding literature assumes that agents who veto a mechanism can enforce a situation in which the public good is never provided. This paper instead considers majority voting with uniform cost sharing as the relevant status quo. E¢ cient mechani...
متن کاملVoting, Punishment, and Public Goods
Researchers have found that voting can help increase voluntary contributions to a public good—provided enforcement through a third party. Not all collective agreements, however, guarantee third-party enforcement. We design an experiment to explore whether a voting rule with and without endogenous punishment increases contributions to a public good. Our results suggest that voting by itself does...
متن کاملMarkov Equilibrium in Models of Dynamic Endogenous Political Institutions
This paper examines existence of Markov equilibria in a class of dynamic political games (or DPGs). DPGs are infinite horizon games in which political institutions are endogenously determined each period. Specifically, at each date t, a social choice rule determines both the current public policy and the social choice rule to be used in date t + 1. These rules are instrumental choices in the se...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Games
دوره 8 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017